Before the cinemas shut up shop for the duration, I was lucky enough to manage to see Jojo Rabbit and I thought it was Taika Waititi's best film to date. I also noted from the opening credits - Based on the novel Caging Skies by Christine Leunens.
Going by the old adage that the book is better than the film, I popped into Waterstones the next day and picked this up.
Based on the novel appears to be somewhat of an overstatement. The film bears as much resemblance to the book as Cannibal the Musical bears to the real life story of Alferd Packer. I think "based on" needs to be changed to "vaguely inspired by".
The central idea is there - fanatical member of Nazi youth discovers his mother is hiding a Jewish girl in the attic. But that's as far as teh resemblance goees.
Johannes isn't a cute young 12 year old innnocently falling in love with the girl. He doesn't have a weird invisible friend in darling Adolf himself. He's 16 when he finds her, and his interest in her is less than innocent. And, when the war finishes, the film finishes, but the book has nearly 200 pages left. The book is almost a different genre completely from the film.
I stilll love the film. The changes to the story are necessary to keep an audience watching I suppose. The Hollywood need to give your protagonist some redemption if he's done things he shouldn't seem to dictate the way the film moves. The invisible friend is a brilliant shorthand way to show how infatuated with the third Reich young Jojo is. He's also shown to be a nice guy at heart frequently and learns how misguided he's been.
The book is so much darker. We read everything from Johannes' first person viewpoint. We witness his indoctrination by the Nazi ideals after the Auschluss. We don't need a goofy Hitler figure telling him what to do, he's more than happy to join in with the bookburning for himself.
Johannes is far from a compassionate, or indeed reliable, narrator and his conscious cruelty to Elsa is never redeemed. The book reads more as a descent into madness and borderline psycological thriller than the happy fantasyesque story the film led me to expect.
However it's so well done that the confounding of the expectations is a good thing in this case rather than a disappointment. We might not like Johannes as a person, but we still feel his sorrow when family members die and feel sorry for him regardless. And it still manages to pull of a deeply black humour.
The ending leaves a few unanswered questions, as it should given the lack of reliability of the narrator.
All in all, this is a completely different experience and story to the film, and disturbing as hell in places. I loved nearly every page of it.
A strong contender for best book of the year. A solid 9/10
Thorough, unbiased, mostly spoiler free reviews of the books I happen to read. Strangely popular in Czechia on Tuesdays...
Showing posts with label Film. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Film. Show all posts
Saturday, 4 April 2020
Saturday, 22 February 2020
Number 9 - Ghastle and Yule - Josh Malerman
Yes, the picture shows Bird Box. This is now the fourth copy of that book that I own - the original hardback I read, the special edition from Dark Regions Press, the regular netflix tie in edition (with Sandra Bullock on the front) that I was sent from Amazon instead of this one, and this one.
This one is the pre-netflix UK paperback. It's special because it has a complete novella tagged in after the novel. It's not announced on the back cover, or even in the contents list (because there is no contents list). It's just there at the back of the book.
If you want to read Ghastle and Yule in treebook format, this is the only place to find it, and you have to find the copy without the netflix logo on it. I did find a copy with this picture on, but the netflix logo added, and the extra story was missing. Eventually, I found one from a private seller on E-bay and asked specifically if it was the right one before placing my remarkably cheap bid.
The story is easily available for your kindle, but I don't own an e-reader and I'm not particularly interested in buying one either. Tree-books all the way for me.
After all that effort to find this, was it worth it?
Silly question - this is Josh Malerman and I'm yet to find a story of his that I dislike. This one is no exception.
It's the story of two competing horror film directors in the late 50s/early 60s and told from the POV of a cinematographer who works with both of them. They each accuse the other of stealing their ideas/films and things steadily get worse between them until... no spoilers.
It's a really intriguing story which I will definitely be rereading at some point. There's very little explanation given as to how the idea theft - the accusations go well beyong mere plagiarism - is happening. There are hints but nothing definitive. We get a great portrait of two polar opposites at loggerheads as they, in their own ways, jointly create an entire new subgenre of horror films.
It's told in Malerman's usual crisp prose style and is a fantastic tale of paranoia and professional jealousy, and maybe something much more disturbing.
I really want to watch all of the films described in the book. They really do sound remarkably good. Malerman's prose is uncluttered but strangely evocative and he brings these films to life in the story.
This book is well worth getting hold of. It's easiest to find in kindle format, but if you're like me, and fancy a bit of a hunt, get this edition. You won't be disappointed.
This one is the pre-netflix UK paperback. It's special because it has a complete novella tagged in after the novel. It's not announced on the back cover, or even in the contents list (because there is no contents list). It's just there at the back of the book.
If you want to read Ghastle and Yule in treebook format, this is the only place to find it, and you have to find the copy without the netflix logo on it. I did find a copy with this picture on, but the netflix logo added, and the extra story was missing. Eventually, I found one from a private seller on E-bay and asked specifically if it was the right one before placing my remarkably cheap bid.
The story is easily available for your kindle, but I don't own an e-reader and I'm not particularly interested in buying one either. Tree-books all the way for me.
After all that effort to find this, was it worth it?
Silly question - this is Josh Malerman and I'm yet to find a story of his that I dislike. This one is no exception.
It's the story of two competing horror film directors in the late 50s/early 60s and told from the POV of a cinematographer who works with both of them. They each accuse the other of stealing their ideas/films and things steadily get worse between them until... no spoilers.
It's a really intriguing story which I will definitely be rereading at some point. There's very little explanation given as to how the idea theft - the accusations go well beyong mere plagiarism - is happening. There are hints but nothing definitive. We get a great portrait of two polar opposites at loggerheads as they, in their own ways, jointly create an entire new subgenre of horror films.
It's told in Malerman's usual crisp prose style and is a fantastic tale of paranoia and professional jealousy, and maybe something much more disturbing.
I really want to watch all of the films described in the book. They really do sound remarkably good. Malerman's prose is uncluttered but strangely evocative and he brings these films to life in the story.
This book is well worth getting hold of. It's easiest to find in kindle format, but if you're like me, and fancy a bit of a hunt, get this edition. You won't be disappointed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

