Number 86- Interview with the Vampire - Anne Rice

 

This one certainly needs no introduction. Unbelievably, this is the first time I've read it.  It was a shameful gap in my reading experience.

The vampire Louis spills his guts about the blood he's spilled since he was converted by Lestat in the 18th century.

This book certainly has an awful lot to answer for.  This marks the beginning of the end of the vampire as a terrifying creature of the night and paved the way for Twilight and its countless imitators.

I remember the days when we laughed at clowns and were scared of vampires.  That seems to have reversed itself, and this book was the start of that switch.

At the time it was written, the theme of the horror of immortality was pretty revolutionary I suppose. It's unfair to judge this on what I feel to be its negative impact so I will try not to do that.

The book is told as the titular interview.  It's a long conversation between the unnamed boy with his cassette recorder, and Louis. 

Louis tells of his first meeting with Lestat back in the days when he (Louis) ran a plantation in New Orleans. After Lestat turned him, they moved in together and while Louis ate mostly animals, Lestat was happier using the slaves as his own personal livestock. 

We are then told of their escape from New Orleans once the slaves cottoned on (it was a sugar plantation so no pun happening there as much as I wish for it to be) and their subsequent travels and further conversions- including the creation of Claudia the child vampire. I did not realise how much the film version had aged up the character of Claudia until I read this.

Louis' whining begins to grate after a while.  I do think that there's a fair bit of repetition in his list of woes and the book could have been more effective if it was a bit shorter- or if the French sequence had been longer.  I liked the larger crowd of vampires and thought there should have been more interaction there. 

There are a lot of unanswered questions going on in this book- something I quite like since they didn't feel like the links into potential sequels that they probably were.

I thought it was occasionally very overwritten.  there were places where Louis would pontificate on the moral implications of his next decision for so long that by the time he'd made his mind up I'd forgotten what he was trying to decide...

It was never less than readable and occasionally very good indeed.  But there are definitely bits where I thought it dragged.  This book has been added to that very small list of books where I prefer the film.

There I said it.