Milly and Billy Ting are back.
Thorough, unbiased, mostly spoiler free reviews of the books I happen to read. Strangely popular in Czechia on Tuesdays...
Thursday, 29 February 2024
Number 18- The Night eaters Book 2 Her Little Reapers- Liu & Takeda
Milly and Billy Ting are back.
Monday, 26 February 2024
Number 17- The Assault- Harry Mulisch
This was this month's book group read. I'd never heard of it before but it sounded interesting and that's an intriguing cover.
In wartime Holland, a local police chief and collaborator is shot dead in the street outside a row of houses. The owner of the house he died in front of runs out and moves it down the road to the front of Anton's house, Anton is 12 and lives with his family.
When the Nazis arrive shortly after the shooting, Anton and his family are dragged out of the house and, not long afterwards, Anton is the the only survivor and the house is razed to the ground.
The story follows Anton into his middle age with the last section being set in 1981, 36 years after the events of that fateful night.
I'd love to say that this was a great book, but I can't. Something in the writing just didn't gel with me. It started well, the story of the shooting and subsequent events of that night are well told and believable. I felt real sympathy for young Anton as his world crumbled around him.
But as the book progresses the story loses all cohesiveness, there isn't much of a story. we revisit Anton at random times through his life at various times that remind him of that night, or shed light on some things he didn't know about. The selections seem random and, in all cases where he learns new information about that night, it's due to amazing coincidences that stretch all creduly.
I don't like to criticise the prose in a translated novel since it's the translator not the original author who's responsible. But in this case I will say that the prose is not great. There are pages of quite dull philosophical musings that either were not good in the original, or have translated really badly.
It took me over a week to read this 200 page novel. It was difficult for me to pull together the enthusiasm to continue with the book after the first time jump.
The last chapter did manage to pull off a true surprise revelation, which obviously I won't share here. Although this revelation came after the biggest coincicidental meeting in the book, which lessens the impact somewhat. There were a million better ways he could have met the person in question.
So overall, this book was a disappointment. It started well, but its lights faded rather quickly despite the occasional bon mot. Too much tedious philosophising and the author talking direct to the reader.
Not one I would recommend, unless you're fanatical about post war Holland.
Thursday, 15 February 2024
Number 16- Horrorstor - Grady Hendrix
Monday, 12 February 2024
Numbers 13-15- Family Tree- Jeff Lemire et all
Friday, 9 February 2024
Number 12- True Confessions of Adrian Mole etc- Sue Townsend
The first two Adrian Mole books are amongst my all time favourite reads, but somehow I had never quite got round to reading any of the others.
So here is volume 3.
As far as story goes, it's more of the same. Adrian is now 18 years old and working his first job.
It starts promisingly enough with some good laughs in the first segment. However, the format changes from the usual diary entries not far into the book and for me, the change of format doesn't quite work.
There's also an issue that, as a child, Adrian can be excused his behaviour to a large extent, but he hasn't changed or matured in the slightest in this volume, and the same childish self-centred assholery (my god, the autocorrect isn't flagging that, it's an official word apparently) comes across as just him being an asshole and all-round unpleasant tosser.
His snobbery doesn't feel funny once the format of the book changes. It just comes across as a guy with a superior attitude and he becomes more irritating than amusing. A lot of the humour in the first two books comes from how blissfully unaware he is of what is actually happening around him. That's been replaced by a disdain for everything and that just isn't as funny or appealing.
We hear monologues he apparently made on Radio 4 and see letters sent to Barry Kent before we return briefly to the diary entries.
It has its moments but I found the Mole section of the book to be disappointing.
The Mole section is followed by snippets from the POV of one Susan Lilian Townsend. Specifically, a travel diary of a trip she takes to Majorca, and a trio of essays. The Majorca section and the writing for TV essay are wryly amusing. The description of her trip to Russia feels like a what-I-did-in-the-summer type essay rather than a short story and, whilst it was an ok read with a couple of laughs, I was not enamored with it. Her final essay is quite poor.
The third section of the book is a fictitious diary of a real person- Margaret Hilda Roberts- better known by her married name of Thatcher. This is an all out snark attack on Thatcher, who definitely deserved it. There are very few figures in politics I despise more than her. but the humour didn't land for me other than a few wry grins. I don't know if that's because this section isn't particularly witty- replacing wit and cleverness with snark- or because I'm not as up to date with 1989 politics as I was back then and I'm missing a lot of references.
I should have loved a vicious takedown of Thatcher, but I didn't. It could also be that such a direct piece of political satire doesn't feel like it belongs here. I know the Mole books contain plenty of political comment, but it's folded neatly into the story in the first two volumes. This just feels like a bad fit to me.
Overall I was disappointed with this. there were a few laughs and it was never less than readable. but it's a far cry from the comic heights of the first two books. Is it diminishing returns setting in? If so, I'm not sure I want to venture as far as book 8... I will read the next one and hope it's a return to the successful format of the first books, and that she allows Adrian to actually grow as a person, rather than keeping him in this adolescent mindset his whole life.
Tuesday, 6 February 2024
Number 11- Phobia - Thomas Luke- aka Graham Masterton
If only Graham Masterton was as popular as Stephen King. This book would be the equivalent value of a Richard Bachman copy of Rage. Sadly, he’s not and this isn’t. But check out that glorious cover.
Thomas Luke is a pen name for the aforementioned Mr Masterton and this is his novelisation of an almost forgotten film in the very early 80s.
Graham Masterton is not an author you read if you’re looking for subtlety, depth of meaning and high literature. He does however produce some rather entertaining low budget horror based on assorted demons of world mythologies. He can be very formulaic, but some of his ideas are good and he can be depended on for some well thought out shreddie goodness (see my post on the noble art of the shreddie here)
In this case his hands would have been somewhat tied in that the plot was handed to him with all the twists and turns and character deaths already written by the screenwriters. So any failings I found story wise are not his fault. And there are some serious story failings.
The ending is particularly bad, I’ll detail the reason for that at the end so spoiler alert if you read the final paragraph of this review.
Basic story- Dr Ross is apparently a brilliant psychotherapist with a radical new treatment to help people overcome their phobias. He’s working with a group of five convicts who each committed crimes because of their phobias. One by one, his test subjects start dying in ways related to their phobias. That’s what the back cover says. I’d argue that the first death is not connected to that character’s fear, or death number 3 for that matter. But, as previously mentioned, that’s the fault of one of the 5 people listed as being responsible for the story/screenplay rather than the novelist.
It’s written in Masterton’s usual no nonsense style. There’s no attempts at high literature, and he does well to obfuscate the truth of events and not making it all too obvious.
The characters struggle to gain more than one dimension. They’re literally defined by either their fear, their job, or if they’re attracted to Dr Ross. The cops are particularly cartoonish (although Masterton does call their behaviour out and makes the point that the rest of the cops in the station don’t behave that way any more).
Ross's alleged expertise is one of the less credible parts of the story. There is no way that Ross's techniques would gain any traction, let alone millions in grant funding. It makes the therapy scenes particularly silly.
The deaths are suitably nasty but tame by Masterton’s standards. Again, not really his fault. It’s a quick fun read despite the flaws in the story.
SLIGHT SPOILER- In the last two pages, we have to wonder how someone can swim strongly while holding a gun in their left hand out of the water to keep it dry. That’s an image that seriously does not compute in my brain. And is particularly egregious as it’s one of the final scenes and supposed to be deadly serious.